On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Aitor [ISO-8859-1] Santamarķa Merino wrote:
> Hi, > > After reading the reference documentation on classes, I have a couple of > easy aspects of the documentation that were unclear to me. > > (1) Is there the concept of "static field" or "class field" (meaning a > field that is not instanciated, but remains the same var for all the > instances)? Not yet in 1.0.10 . I believe it is implemented in 1.1 > I know this can be easily made with an external variable, > but I consider it to be a different concept. > The syntax diagrams of classes show that a method can be preceded by the > keyword "class" (and I failed to find where it is explained what for?), > but does not seem to admit this keyword before a field. This is correct. > > (2) In the documentation, it is said "The Inherited keyword will not > jump to the inherited method, if virtual was used." and also "The > compiler will compile it, but using Inherited can produce strange > effects." (where neither of the examples shows the word "Inherited"), > but I fail to understand if these sentences refer to the case in which > you do it wrong, and declare both MyProc as virtual (instead as > "virtual" and "override", respectively). > So should I understand that I can use Inherited without problems if I do > it right? (means virtual/override). Yes. I will check the wording. Michael. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
