> On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, Marco van de Voort wrote: > > > implementation can be dynamically loaded. > > > > Why would an alternate implementation be unloadable just because the built-in > > default one uses a few units? > > I was of course just referring to your last point: i.e. the use of > structures/calls from generic units as Winsock/Linux/Unix was explicitly > avoided.
So was I. I just don't see why :-) This is a mess. It might not even work on linux/ppc, let alone other unices. Anyway, I saw that synapse needs FCL units that are win32/linux only like syncobj, so it is all a moot point. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
