Peter Vreman wrote:
>> I expected my OO routines to be somewhat slower than my equivalent non-OO
>> routines, which was also the case (the non-OO routines uses 10 sec for a
>> 500x500 matrix inversion, while the OO routines uses 110 secs (!) for the
>> same).
>
> Which compiler did you use? Which OO model did you use?
>
> If the answers are 1.0.6 and class then you should try the 1.1 compiler and
> add {$implicitexceptions off}OK, I have just tried it. The result is: 104 secs for fpc 1.1 with implicitexceptions off 108 secs for fpc 1.0.6 So this didn't help much. However I'm quite sure that it has to with the OO-methods for accessing array-elements (this will of course be slower than accessing the elements directly :-)). So I will just (maybe) have to not use these methods in descendant classes if I want better performance... Best regards Preben _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
