Am 09.04.2021 um 23:52 schrieb Ryan Joseph via fpc-devel:

On Apr 9, 2021, at 3:08 PM, Sven Barth <pascaldra...@googlemail.com> wrote:

Possibly, yes...

You could provide the various utility functions in a separate patch.
Well I'm going to use them for this patch so they would all be batched together.

Any idea about the "array of const" issue I raised in the other email? Once 
that's done I'll submit another very patch. Getting very close now unless I missed some 
test cases...
You mean what you did for is_array_literal? A pure array constructor can be found with is_array_constructor, though it might be better to use is_open_array, cause someone might pass an open array parameter to a generic function (those will be unnamed as well).

Regards,
Sven
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Reply via email to