Am 09.04.2021 um 23:52 schrieb Ryan Joseph via fpc-devel:
On Apr 9, 2021, at 3:08 PM, Sven Barth <pascaldra...@googlemail.com> wrote:
Possibly, yes...
You could provide the various utility functions in a separate patch.
Well I'm going to use them for this patch so they would all be batched together.
Any idea about the "array of const" issue I raised in the other email? Once
that's done I'll submit another very patch. Getting very close now unless I missed some
test cases...
You mean what you did for is_array_literal? A pure array constructor can
be found with is_array_constructor, though it might be better to use
is_open_array, cause someone might pass an open array parameter to a
generic function (those will be unnamed as well).
Regards,
Sven
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel