I have created an issue with this patch for ermbedded target, for
unknown reason the 'end;' at the end of the patch for
rtl/embedded/arm/cortexm4f_start.inc is missing, likely when I
copy/pasted I lost that line. Sorry for this....
Will there in the future be a way to provide pull-requests via github
(or does this already work??) I guess that would reduce the likelyhood
of such a stupid error..
And then I also found another small mishap in
rtl/freertos/arm/cortexm4f_start.inc, there a 'not' was left over after
you changed the logic for fpu detection.
When Investigating I saw that lm4f120 is built as armv7m but is actually
armv7em (plus it uses m4f include). Not sure if it is woth fixing a
seven years old file, so I left things as they are.
Michael
diff --git a/rtl/embedded/arm/cortexm4f_start.inc
b/rtl/embedded/arm/cortexm4f_start.inc
index dc2928c70a..62017d9834 100644
--- a/rtl/embedded/arm/cortexm4f_start.inc
+++ b/rtl/embedded/arm/cortexm4f_start.inc
@@ -74,3 +74,4 @@ asm
.Ltext_start:
.long _text_start
{$endif REMAP_VECTTAB}
+end;
diff --git a/rtl/freertos/arm/cortexm4f_start.inc
b/rtl/freertos/arm/cortexm4f_start.inc
index 756aeb994a..62017d9834 100644
--- a/rtl/freertos/arm/cortexm4f_start.inc
+++ b/rtl/freertos/arm/cortexm4f_start.inc
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ asm
.long _data
.L_edata:
.long _edata
-{$if not defined(FPUARM_HAS_VFP_EXTENSION)}
+{$if defined(FPUARM_HAS_VFP_EXTENSION)}
.Lcpacr:
.long 0xE000ED88
{$endif defined(FPUARM_HAS_VFP_EXTENSION)}
Am 19.02.21 um 22:13 schrieb Michael Ring via fpc-devel:
You are the best, thank you!
Michael
Am 19.02.21 um 22:11 schrieb Florian Klämpfl via fpc-devel:
Am 19.02.21 um 21:55 schrieb Michael Ring via fpc-devel:
When rtl for arm-embedded/arm-freertos is build with hardfloat the
fpu should also automagically get enabled, by default it is off
which causes a crash when floats are used.
This small patch fixes that problem in cortexm4f_start.inc
can you please apply this patch to trunk?
Thanks, I applied it in a modified form so the presence of an vfp
unit is checked, this should be more future and fool proof :)
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel