> On Jul 8, 2019, at 2:16 PM, Ben Grasset <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> One thing I might point out as a general tip is that you don't really
> necessarily *need* an array-style index for the kind of access you seem to be
> going for, especially if using something like TValue which has a lot of
> assignment operator overloads in place by default.
>
That was just an example, nothing to do with TValue. We need pointer getters
for “array of record” so we can do:
list[0]^.x := 100;
and it will actually write to the actual record in the array and not a returned
copy. However due to how the properties are currently structured this means we
can’t use the setter without passing pointers:
list[0] := @vec;
That’s why I think it’s worthing considering the overloading properties to
solve this.
Regards,
Ryan Joseph
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - [email protected]
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
