Op 2019-06-19 om 14:30 schreef Виктор Матузенко:
Thanks for the answer!
ср, 19 июн. 2019 г. в 15:07, Marco van de Voort
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>:
- Copy and length are builtins, pos is a function.
builtin+function is
not "true" overloading since both are not the same kind.
Is the term "builtin" documented somewhere? Where can I find list of
all builtin identifiers to check if my libraries conflict with them?
If the documentation lists the function as being in "system.fpd" that is
probably it. You can look at that file (rtl/inc in the sources) to get
an idea.
Can I overload the Pos and not be afraid of that in future versions of fpc
it may suddenly become "builtin" and break some code?
First, where would be the breakage? Now it works with and without overload?
Second, while the chances are low, there are no guarantees. Avoid overly
complex layering of the same symbol if you are afraid of this.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - [email protected]
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
