> Nice spot with the "incq" command there. It wasn't intentional for that to be split into 3 commands, but is likely just a side-effect of pass 1 not being run twice now... granted, since one of my criteria was that the code should not be less optimal, I'll see if I can watch out for that one.
Both versions are kinda equivalent in execution speed. > One interesting thing to note though is that the read and add work on the 32-bit register, but then the full 64-bit register is written. As local variables are meant to be allocated in registers, but procedure has calls to other procedures, they are stored "temporarily" on stack as 64 bit registers. It's not an error or at least not an error for program logic in this case. > > # [468] inc(sk); > > --trunk --------- > > incq 272(%rsp) > > -- overhaul ------- > > movl 272(%rsp),%eax > > addl $1,%eax > > movq %rax,272(%rsp) > > did you mean to be so? > > margers _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
