2018-06-30 8:33 GMT+02:00 Michael Van Canneyt <mich...@freepascal.org>:
> As noted in the bugreport, your own examples did not compile with your > supplied code. > Next time, please test that too. > The most important was to finish new collections, deep refactoring and proper tests suite than testing all examples. Library was totally refactored and something like that may happens. > It is definitely better to have a slower default that works always than a > faster one that does not let all code compile. > No. You are wrong. The more important is test suite than minor example somewhere (which can be easily fixed). For sure faster library with proper test suite is more important than a little outdated example (!sic). > But not problem, please advise on the changes needed to a) fix the > mentioned example so it actually compiles. > b) Speed up the default hash. > > I (or someone else) will be happy to change it. Ok, but in the future you should ask for such important changes. -- Best regards, Maciej Izak
_______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
