On 03.02.2014 18:52, Martin Frb wrote:
On 03/02/2014 15:25, Martin Frb wrote:
On 03/02/2014 14:37, Sven Barth wrote:
Nevertheless FPC provides the correct operator precedence (no matter
whether overloading is used or not, because that is done at a
different level of the parser):
- power
- unary plus/minus
- product/divison
- addition/substraction
By the way, where does ** stand against @ ? ("**" is not in the
precedence table on the docs)
@ always binds stronger than any arithmetic, set, whatever operators (in
the compiler it's implemented as expecting a single factor (maybe with
round brackets), so "@(x - y)" (or any other operator) should not work
either no matter what overloads are available (again, parsing and
resolving operators are different steps)).
Regards,
Sven
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
