On Sun, 4 Dec 2011, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 4 December 2011 21:55, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
doubt it will make it into fpdoc. Core developers always trump mere
contributors like us. ;-)
We simply have a vision and try to remain true to it.
Ideas corresponding to this vision will make it. Others not.
Hardly any time was given to discuss options and alternatives, pros
and cons etc. You simply stated in one message you wanted a project
file for fpdoc, then boom, the project file idea was implemented -
nobody else's ideas count any more from that point on. Core developer
has spoken! :-( One has to love the way the FPC team works.
Unfortunately, Graeme, you are mistaken in your facts.
The fpdoc project file support already exists since almost a year (rev r16711).
It was discussed way before that in the FPC team (Marco will back me up on
this).
There was even a bug tracker item for it in the meantime, half a year ago.
You can examine the SVN log files if you do not take my word.
All I did now was add some options for its manipulation,
based on the problems Hans was experiencing when he tried
to build the FPC docs.
Michael.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
