Am 15.11.2011 21:12, schrieb Jonas Maebe: > > On 15 Nov 2011, at 21:06, Florian Klämpfl wrote: > >> I dn't know if this is a good long term solution: I fear too much >> duplication with having a seperate android target. I'd prefer an >> FPC_ANDROID define, I don't think that it will pollute the rtl and >> considering that there are a lot of arm "sub architectures" out >> there having an own target for each of them isn't a good idea >> either. Maybe we can even introduce some SUBARCH in the long term >> into our build system. > > Android isn't a different architecture (if you consider native > applications), but a different OS. It uses a Linux kernel (although > even that one is heavily patched, afaik), and user land is obviously > quite different (including the C library and the dynamic linker).
But gcc considers it as arm-linux-eabi as well, no? _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - [email protected] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
