On 31/08/2011, Marco van de Voort wrote: > > To avoid duplication of information (make change in pascal source of > declaration, and have to make it in the .XML source) of course.
So we agree. :-) > IMHO both Dodi and you should take a step back and describe problems (or > maybe even the usecase that is not possible now). Not try to argument on > vague principles. Macro, marco, marco. Please don't jump to such incorrect conclusions. We (You, Michael and myself) are clearly agreeing on how fpdoc should work. I too, don't understand Dodi's logic about fpdoc not needing to parse the pascal sources. I think parsing the pascal sources makes a lot of sense, and fpdoc is indeed doing the correct thing. > but I think you should start with the actual problem, not with a possible > (and terribly hackish) solution. Again, it is very entertaining seeing you go off in your own direction. But I lost you here. I have no clue what you are talking about. But the fact that we actually agree on how fpdoc works (even though you clearly misunderstood my previous messages in this regard), I guess it is not important anyway. :-) -- Regards, - Graeme - _______________________________________________ fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit http://fpgui.sourceforge.net _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - [email protected] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
