On Thu, July 15, 2010 14:06, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > Op 2010-07-15 06:26, Sergei Gorelkin het geskryf: >> >> Message processing indeed includes some overhead, but this is not #1 >> bottleneck to worry about. >> Maybe #10 or so. > > Well, any optimization is better than none. Irrespective of where you rank > it, one has to start somewhere.
Have I misunderstood something, or is this optimization really just about the fact that message loading is not necessary if the compiler is requested to output no messages at all? Even if this (probably extremely rare!) case happens, the difference must be completely negligible unless you perform very many compilations of simple and short source files without further dependencies (which doesn't sound like a typical use case to me ;-) ), right? Tomas _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - [email protected] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
