On 22 June 2010 14:38, Marco van de Voort <[email protected]> wrote: > In our previous episode, Henry Vermaak said: >> >> Why is that? ?I thought you could use anything, as long as it's posix >> >> compliant? >> > >> > Good luck getting all the C libs to use your POSIX compatible threading >> > model. >> >> The reason for creating a native threading implementations is that you >> _don't_ have to use libc. Why would you use a native one if you're >> linking to libc anyway? > > Why would you need a native one in the first place?
I was under the impression that fpc uses libc to implement threads on unix. Is this not the case? Henry _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - [email protected] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
