2010/6/9 Adem <[email protected]>: > On 2010-06-09 16:31, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > >> But then somebody would throw the "not delphi compatible" card at me. >> I seem to be stuck in a endless loop: I find a issue, report it, >> get told it's not delphi compatible, everybody ignores issue. Repeat. >> > > I don't get it. > > I can see that what Graeme is pointing out does have merit. > > Why reject it altogether with an arguement like "it's not Delphi > compatible"?
* Because it would be idiotic to change something based on a point of view of one person. * It would break everyone else's applications. > > Doesn't FPC have a 'Delphi Compatible' mode, as well as a native mode? Afaik that's only for language features (I hope). > Why not keep the 'Delphi compatible' arguement to 'Delphi mode', but allow it > in FPC native mode? Why don't we introduce a GraphicalBounds function? Henry _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - [email protected] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
