In our previous episode, Paul Ishenin said: > > That doesn't help, since still breaks existing code that might not even use > > C++ extensions. But I assume this is done in a separate mode (or > > modeswitch?) > > > Sorry? & needs to be placed in the pascal code. So I don't see what > existing code can it break? I believe there is no existsing pascal code > which can link with c++ classes.
Sorry, misread. Should have known better than C++ adding keywords. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - [email protected] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
