Am 29.01.2010 12:08, schrieb Marco van de Voort: > In our previous episode, Aleksa Todorovic said: >> >> Absolutely! But in the first instance, we need to choose if this is >> actually going to be part of FPC or not. > > I don't really see a need for this. Some languages are terminator, some are > separator. We are also not Basic in that we try to disambiguate every > possible syntax. > > It is just a risk without real benefit attached to it, so I'm against.
+1
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
