Paul Ishenin пишет:
What I can't understand why the biggest %time has the lowest seconds. E.g:
The second column is a cumulative time, i.e. sum of the time for the given function and everything
above it.
As result I don't understand which functions must be reviewed at first.
Have anybody tried that before?
I did, but using Linux+valgrind rather than cygwin+gprof. IMHO valgrind (in its callgrind flavour)
outputs more useful profile information.
Some time ago I was able to optimize away about 20% of executed CPU instructions in the compiler,
which however didn't decrease its execution time by any noticeable amount. So, going for another 20%
will be a much more complicated task, beware.
Sergei
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
