On 5 okt 2006, at 18:41, Micha Nelissen wrote:
Jonas Maebe wrote:
But this does not help users, third party packages etc. Breaking
compilation of sloppy code is one thing, but introducing silent
bugs is
a whole other issue.
Hmm. What type is @X in {$T-} ? Is it a special type ? Maybe the
compiler can give a warning when you do arithmetic on this kind of
type ?
It's a plain void pointer (like when you would add a pointer() type
cast around it).
$ (find -regex '.*\.\(pp\|pas\|inc\)' | xargs grep '@[^,]*+') | less
Shouldn't that be '@[^,]+' ?
No, the idea is to find @expr+, so where you take the address *and* do
arithmetic on the result. That's why there aren't that many cases
of it.
Shouldn't the + then be escaped normally? Or is it only "1 or more of
the previous" in egrep?
Jonas
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
