> > Marco van de Voort napisa?(a): > > > >> Since the maillists are a bit irregular, I want to repeat the point that > >> the relative slowliness of the revcomp benchmark is the repeated > >> realloc, not the reading of the textfile (though a small settextbuf > >> might improve it > >> a bit). > >> > >> > > Its not true. Realloc is invoked only few times. Most of times consume > > readln. You may try remove all lines from revcom except readln, and then > > see, that time of computation has near 80% of prev. From the second > > side, i remove only readln (pass only const string) and revcom speed has > > 4 times faster. > > > > Did you test with files > 10 MB?
.. and on *nix ? (since that is where the benchmarks run) _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - [email protected] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
