Bram Kuijvenhoven wrote: > Besides using TVarRecs, we could also use pointers (as in > classes.TList) or objects.
Pointers like in TList were the things I had in mind. > This would perhaps be a bit like it is in java.util. Then we would > also need container classes for basic types such as boolean, integer, > string and float. I'm not sure whether this is indeed a good plan, but > I'm just mentioning it because you said you want to look at 'all the > options' :) Yes, the containers for basic types could be constructed as wrappers, the pointer based containers would be incapsulated. > > > Anyway, I'm very interested in a library with commonly used generic > data structures and algorithms, and I think there are many more such > developers. So I'd say: keep up the goods plans & work! Good to know that are many people interested in the subject. I'm sure I'll learn a lot of things from them, as always in this great community :) Ciao, Dean _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
