On Mon, 23 May 2005 02:29:48 +0200 Konstantin Münning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But when there is no memory left and you need > some you can't behave perfect. Please let it be the programmers choice > what to do and how to handle this. It is. Exceptions, ReturnNil, ... > A compiler should be providing the > means, not taking them away. Environment changes sometimes you know! Thus, so does the RTL. There are new means now. > Anybody writing a program knows that there > may be flaws. A warning (with an advice how to make it better) should > still be the best for this. Warning: compilation failure; make it better: here on mailing list. > I would hapily contribute the code for a better MemAvail/MaxAvail > function if that's the problem. I would like to be able to use the > latest compiler which now I definitely can't as I must have the BP7 > compatibility which is very good in 1.0.10. Well, define these functions in your own compatibility unit then ? Micha _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
