> Jose Manuel wrote: > > >I think sets are sets and enumerated types are enumerated types, > and Pascal > >is Pascal- > > > > > Ok, but in pascal the elements in a set can only be of ordered > type anyway.
Yes, of course. Maybe I haven't explained myself. Indeed, and you are quite right you'got to define a set of ... (an scalar or enumerated type you've previously defined), but once you're created the set is a "set", there are no order established. I think this is no place nor time to talk about Cantor or whether a subset is part of itself, etc. I just keep on my opinion (until you refuse me with arguments, and I will accept them gratefully, don't doubt on that), that casting that way is against Pascal's spirit (and against Boolean Algebra, I think). Anyway, it's only my opinion. As Michael would say, there are more (and more neccessary) things to do than to speak in this list about angels' sex. JMR _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
