Hi, On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 9:21 PM, Alexandre Franke <alexandre.fra...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 7:55 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) > <zeesha...@gnome.org> wrote: >> Yeah I understand that but I'm wondering if they could be persuaded >> not to treat all applying projects equally and give more room and time >> to projects that are more popular/bigger. I didn't want to say bad of >> any projects in particular here but I feel I have to give an example, >> to make my point so I'll mention one that I actually love: Guile. >> Given that there is a handful of people who use Guile (or even Scheme >> in general), I really don't see why it should be given the same amount >> of room/time as GNOME and KDE. > > We were also allocated a single table instead of the usual two we get > to make room for more projects. See it this way: the ones you call > bigger projects usually have the means to hold at least one yearly > conference on their own. The smaller ones don't get to meet that > often. Also they really need the exposure FOSDEM provides them, and as > you say the bigger projects are already popular. If the Guile people > don't have a talk at FOSDEM, where would they have it?
I'm not saying that those projects should not get any exposure. Such projects could be put in the same room and 1-2 talks per project would suffice IMO. I don't think all popular-enough projects have their own conferences but yeah I see your point there. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) ________________________________________ Befriend GNOME: http://www.gnome.org/friends/ _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
