On Do, 2015-11-05 at 10:18 -0800, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: > On 15-11-05 10:08 AM, Benjamin Berg wrote: > > Actually, the way I read section 8.2.4 combined with 8.4.1 right now it > > seems perfectly sane to argue that Christian could have finished his > > term in office despite the change of affiliation. > > Would the board and Christian consider doing this, and also establish > precedent that in the future, only affiliation at the time of candidacy is > relevant to the 40% rule?
At this point Christian has resigned already and electing him to be on the board *would* be a violation of section 8.2.4. But yes, one could decide to handle it that way in the future. Benjamin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
