Bastien Nocera <had...@hadess.net> wrote: >> Second, OPW has been beneficial for GNOME. It has raised our profile >> and further established our role as leaders in the Free Software >> world. Our sponsors are enthusiastic about OPW (conversely, moving OPW >> out of GNOME would give them one less reason to support us). > > While that was true when it was limited to participation in GNOME > itself, that's not the case anymore. All of the branding is now > "FossOPW": > https://wiki.gnome.org/OutreachProgramForWomen
I'm pretty sure that our Ad Board members know that we administer the programme. We also do our own marketing, such as the latest Annual Report, which had a section on OPW, and was distributed to Ad Board members. > And reading a blog post like this: > http://sarah.thesharps.us/2013/05/23/%EF%BB%BF%EF%BB%BFopw-update/ > it feels like it wasn't people in GNOME that came up with programme, but > that GNOME was just the first organisation to benefit from it (see "What > is the FOSS Outreach Program for Women"). While the interpretation isn't quite right, that blog post talks about GNOME and does so positively. It's giving us good exposure. Allan _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
