On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 14:06 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 12:50 +0100, Allan Day wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 11:26 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > > On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 10:45 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 10:23:47AM +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > > > > Also, based on recent discussions, I would like to help define the > > > > > message we give to 3rd parties about what GNOME is, so there is no > > > > > confusion as to what those 3rd parties should expect from GNOME. > > > > > > > > Do you think GNOME means GNOME shell or not? > > > > > > yes, I do > > > > Could you both elaborate, please? > > > > Rodrigo: can you explain how the GNOME project will benefit? Why is your > > approach better than the alternatives? > > > well, not sure my approach is better, I'm sure other candidates will > have great ideas also, just that there seems to be a lot of discussions > about what GNOME OS is/is not or should/should not be. So I'd like to > contribute in making it clear what the whole GNOME project is for 3rd > parties. > > As my personal opinion, I agree completely on the GNOME OS idea, > although we should really not forget other OSes (Solaris, *BSD, etc) > that use GNOME or other systems (Meego, etc) that are interested in just > using our platform. So, I will try to keep the focus on the GNOME OS > idea (with GNOME Shell, to answer again Olav's question) but making sure > this doesn't break our relationship with those other systems. > > Does this answer your question?
Yes thanks! :) Allan -- Blog: http://afaikblog.wordpress.com/ IRC: aday on irc.gnome.org _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
