<quote who="The Face of Sun Microsystems"> > > Consensus and execution become crippling problems because no director > > has a responsibility to the organisation to push it forward (by either > > dropping an issue for that term or executing it). > > I'm not convinced you can do this with 11 people though - it's too big a > number to create synergy between the team, as you mention in a previous > mail about the usual numbers for these types of groups. > > I do agree with your proposal for a standard 4 member elected executive. > Having 3 committee members on top of that seems like it would complement > that, rather than the additional 7 which feels too crowded, hence why I'm > voting "YES" ;)
7 is way too small to represent the diversity of our community. Consider it in these terms: 2 people from 3 contributing companies and 1 other person. No thanks. Our community deserves a diverse board, and structured leadership for our organisation. - Jeff -- UbuntuBelowZero in Montreal! http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBelowZero "GNOME, launched specifically to counter a threat to our freedom, is the free software project par excellence." - Richard Stallman _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
