Why do we need a seperate Wikipedia project for this? Surely userspace
drafts are acceptable, they just need 'mainstreaming'...
Richard Symonds
Office& Development Manager
Wikimedia UK
+44 (0) 207 065 0992
--
Wikimedia UK is the operating name of Wiki UK Limited, a Charitable Company
Registered in England and Wales, No: 6741827. Charity No:1144513 Office: 4th
Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street,
London EC2A 4LT.
Wikimedia UK is the local chapter of the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate
Wikipedia, amongst other projects). It is an independent non-profit
organization with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for
its contents.
On 21/03/2012 16:40, Robin McCain wrote:
This is an excellent idea - a kind of searchable sandbox where
articles could eventually be promoted into the main site or simply
used as in depth backing for a Wikipedia One article. It would need to
have some high level sort mechanism to make it easier to access
articles within a geopolitical area or niche focal point just to make
it possible to disambiguate persons with the same name or the various
flavors of engineering or architecture. Perhaps it could also serve as
a beta test bed for Wikimedia software development.
But what to call it? Wikipedia2 doesn't have much flavor.
WikipediaLocalized? WikiDetails? WikipediaExpanded? WikipediaSuppliment?
On 3/20/2012 5:24 PM, foundation-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org wrote:
From: David Goodman<dgge...@gmail.com>
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
<foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
Cc:r...@slmr.com
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] [WikiEN-l] Stopping the presses:,
Britannica to stop printing books
Message-ID:
<caniz0h18gyrky79jawzzskuaewd8rtwdc6mztun_y+66d7p...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
For English, and other languages also:
What I suggest is a '''Wikipedia Two'' - an encyclopedia supplement
where the standard of notability is much relaxed, but which will be
different from Wikia by still requiring Verifiability and NPOV. It
would include the lower levels of barely notable articles in
Wikipedia, and a good deal of what we do not let in.
It would for example include both high schools and elementary schools.
It would include college athletes. It would include political
candidates. It would include neighborhood businesses, and fire
departments. It would include individual asteroids. It would include
streets--and also villages. It would include ever ball game in a
season. It would include anyone who had a credited role in a film,
or any named character in one--both the ones we currently leave out,
and the ones we put in.
This should satisfy both the inclusionists and the deletionists. The
deletionists would have this material out of Wikipedia, the
inclusionists would have it not rejected. Newcomers would have an open
and accepting place for a initial experience.
But it would be interesting to see the results of a search option:
Do you want to see everything (WP+WP2), or only the really notable (WP)?
Anyone care to guess which people would choose?
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l