Dario Taraborelli <dtarabore...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > James, I think I have replied consistently to your requests, both on wiki > and by mail....
Anyone can judge for themselves whether this is true by looking at http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research_talk:FAQ There you claimed that research approval was a mandatory policy, and much more recently you thanked a third party for an edit which clearly implies that it is strictly mandatory. But in September 2010 you agreed with the rest of the RCom that research subject recruitment approval should not be mandatory in favor of published guidelines instead. And when called on the inconsistency, you wrote that approval is not in fact mandatory. Both can not be true. Instead of apologizing for your lie with which you attempted to impugn my integrity, you have been trying to cover it up with rhetoric. Is that behavior considered acceptable at the Wikimedia Foundation? Sincerely, James Salsman _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
