Or, more precisely, the English Wikipedia list: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l .
This list is for movement-wide issues. An ArbCom exists only in some language projects and is not a movement-wide issue. 2012/3/11 Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com>: > Hoi, > This would in my opinion be more appropriate on the Wikipedia-l. This list > is for foundation related subjects. > Thanks, > GerardM > > On 11 March 2012 12:19, Robert Alvarez <vez...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Can anyone explain why Arbcom members are not required to refrain from >> posting and responding to requests on Wikipedia Review while they are on >> Arbcom? It seems a basic conflict of interest to be actively promoting the >> opinions and drawing unnecessary attention to attack posts against >> Wikipedia contributers by banned users. >> >> I see at least two current Arbcom members posting there quite recently and >> even responding to requests of banned users to do things on their behalf on >> Wikipedia (such as John Vandenberg working for Edward Buckner). >> >> One might argue that Arbcom members have a right to free speech, however >> this seems to cross the boundaries into undermining the fundamental >> principles and the values of the Wikimedia Foundation. >> >> Bob >> _______________________________________________ >> foundation-l mailing list >> foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l >> > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
