We appear to have a problem with Arbcom. We have an editor who has contributed significantly to Wikipedia over the previous 7 years, making more than 100,000 edits and generating a couple of featured articles. Than in a vote of 8 to 4 he is block indefinitely for issues related to a specific religious movement.
The foundation is spending large sums in an attempt to attract productive editors to the project. Arbcoms actions seem counterproductive to these efforts. Is it time that we look at rearranging how arbcom works? Issues that have a significant effect on Wikipedia should not be left to a group of 12 but should go to the community for consensus. -- James Heilman MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
