phoebe ayers wrote: [snip] > It seems clear however that regardless, there is both much technical > and social work that needs to be done around controversial content > that has nothing to do with image hiding, e.g. to improve Commons > search, rigorously get model releases, etc. etc.; and also that for > any particular technical proposal around image hiding there would be > many, many (perhaps insuperable) issues and details to work out.
Yes. Implementing even basic image tagging would be helpful, I think. Lots of low-hanging software development fruit on Commons. > I'd like to point out here that the other points addressed in both of > the controversial content resolutions > (http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Resolution:Images_of_identifiable_people > and http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Resolution:Controversial_content), > though much less controversial, are also quite important! Thank you for the detailed response. :-) I think having the resolutions published is great, but I also think having an index with statuses of high-level projects would also be good. Somewhere where outsiders and insiders can look and answer a question about the status of X (e.g., controversial content software implementation) without needing to bother Board members. ;-) Any ideas on implementing something like that? I'm not sure how many other high-level projects there are, even. Any guidance on this would be great and appreciated. MZMcBride _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
