On 02/19/12 12:04 PM, Mike Godwin wrote:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 3:57 AM, Mike Christie<coldchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
Perhaps the policies can be improved, but they are written to stop bad
editing rather than to encourage good editing. I don't think that can be
changed. It's impossible to legislate good judgement, and it's judgement
that was called for with the Haymarket article.
If policies don't encourage good judgment, or discourage bad judgment,
then what are policies for?
It seems worth discussing whether it would be good to revise the
existing policy to restore its original (presumed) functionality.
More generally, I've believed for a long time that WP policies have
been increased, modified, and subverted in ways that both create a
higher barrier to entry for new editors and that discourage both new
editors and existing ones.
Policies in general tend to discourage judgement of any sort. Even when
such policies are classified as guidelines there will always be those
who seek their rigid application. In criminal law, when an accused is
acquitted of a particularly heinous crime there will always be those who
believe that it's because the law was not tough enough. They often
succeed in making it tougher, and end up catching more fish than intended.
I just passed my 10th Wiki Birthday, and I'm certainly discouraged from
much substantial editing. I often leave material that I suspect to be
wrong because the emotional cost of making the correction is much too
high. If others do that too the reliability of the entire Wikipedia is
put in question.
As Mark has said, some subjects are highly vulnerable to recentism, but
one shouldn't expect that with a historical article about events from
1886. When crowdsourcing it is dangerous to assume that the majority
will always be right. That perpetuates errors, and makes correcting
them very difficult. Whatever we think of Stalin we want to spell his
name right. An English speaking majority in a Google ranking refers to
him as Joseph even if a stricter or more scholarly transliteration gives
Josef. Whatever spelling we choose alters the landscape; as a highly
popular source that is often quoted and copied we set the standard for
what is correct. Our errors will establish the norm. We become our own
uncertainty principle.
Ray
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
