2011/10/28 Tim Starling <tstarl...@wikimedia.org> > On 28/10/11 01:43, emijrp wrote: > > Obvious sarcasm is obvious. But people think you are serious. > > > > I'm not sure who is more dangerous, stupid politicians speaking about > > closing sites or stupid wikipedians closing Wikipedia sites when > politicians > > speak about closing sites. > > About 90% of everything that comes out of Domas's mouth is sarcasm. So > if you don't know whether he's being sarcastic about something, you > can assume that he is and get it right 90% of the time. > > Domas probably had the same reaction to the Italian Wikipedia protest > as I did. We both spend a lot of time making sure Wikipedia is always > up and available for people to read, so it's painful to see a small > proportion of a wiki's users decide to take a whole wiki offline for > everyone. > > -- Tim Starling > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:SOPA_initiative#Comment_on_blackouts_and_technical_feasibilities
"...it is very likely that we will not be able to make 100% sure that nobody can access Wikipedia..." @Domas, @Tim: As Wikimedia tech staff. Have you changed your mind? Are you working to blackout English Wikipedia? _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
