On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 17:54, Nathan <nawr...@gmail.com> wrote: > In fairness to the Foundation, they did have a very public strategic > planning process and they do seem to be adhering to the outcome of > that process. From what I saw, a pretty fair amount of the strategic > planning output and outcomes were driven by employees and contractors, > but there was a more than adequate opportunity for public / community > input. As a result, there is natural skepticism for any claim that the > WMF has or is tending to diverge from community standards with respect > to broad trends in spending or fundraising. Moreover, the constituency > for the WMF is often viewed as the 500 million or so unique monthly > visitors; in this light, even a torrent of complaints on a mailing > list can easily be seen as "those few people who will always complain > no matter what you do." >
Sure, that's why I was hoping to take into account some summary of what OTRS e-mailers said (obviously in an anonymous, statistical form). -- Tom Morris <http://tommorris.org/> _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
