On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 4:29 AM, Erik Moeller <e...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 3:57 AM, Liam Wyatt <liamwy...@gmail.com> wrote: >> One thing I'd like to ask (which may be in the on-wiki documentation, sorry >> if you've >> already answered there) is what is going to happen to the other articles >> that are not >> part of this new test group? > > Hi Liam, > > this is the first time we're experimenting with free text feedback in > a serious way. We've not decided yet whether that's a good idea or > not. This will depend in large part on the signal/noise ratio and > volume of the feedback we're getting, which will be coded through the > process described here: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Article_Feedback_Tool/Version_5/Feedback_evaluation > > Note, also, that some of the forms include different forms of > quantitative feedback as well. We'll evaluate those as well, and > compare our findings with what we've learned, and are still learning, > from AFTv4. This evaluation will precede any site-wide changes to the > current AFT deployment.
Sorry, did a double-take there. Tell me I read that wrong, please! My eyes must be deceiving me or my reading comprehension not being quite up to the task right now... But some weird brainfart made me read that in such a way that you were suggesting that the english language wikipedia would be used as a test bed for what should be deployed side-wide. Please tell me I am hallucinating, misreading you grotesquely, or there is some other clear communication disconnect! Perhaps it is as simple a misapprehension as that while you linked to an english language page on tbe tool, in fact it has translations in several other language wikipedias which are trying it out as well... ? -- -- Jussi-Ville Heiskanen, ~ [[User:Cimon Avaro]] _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
