On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 11:08:21AM +0000, Fae wrote:
> It would not be an unreasonable corrective action to take their boastful
> claims at face value and stick dirty great COI notices on the top of every
> Wikipedia article about each of their clients; with a suitable explanation
> on every talk page pointing to the newspaper source until a credible
> assessment has been completed to ensure no possible conflict of interest
> has compromised article neutrality.
That would be fighting POV with POV. Better to go through the list with a bunch
of
patrollers, and just NPOVize the lot. :-) [citation needed] and all that. Check
page
history for misbehaviour as well.
sincerely,
Kim Bruning
--
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
