On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 11:18:23PM +0400, Yaroslav M. Blanter wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:37:05 +0200, Kim Bruning <k...@bruning.xs4all.nl>
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 01:44:09PM +0400, Yaroslav M. Blanter wrote:
> >> I was following the discussion without ever giving my own opinion, and
> my
> >> impression is that we are going nowhere.
> >>
> >>
> >> I think what should come next is that one of the filter proponents
> would
> >> come up with a suggestion for a workable scheme. (I guess the opponents
> >> of
> >> the filter would not be so much interested).
> >
> <...>
> > If there are but few additions, we can go straight to bugzilla. If
> people
> > feel that
> > adjustment is needed, we can take this to meta first, before moving to
> > bugzilla.
> >
> > sincerely,
> > Kim Bruning
>
> We definitely must have the page on Meta discussing it. There have been
> some objections raised already, and there have been other solutions
> suggested earlier, and other objections raised. Bringing it straight to
> Bugzilla makes no sense at this point.
Roger that,
I'll (re)join the community discussion.
Which page(s) are being used atm?
sincerely,
Kim Bruning
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
