I was on Commons and stumbled across a photograph of a man cumming onto a cracker and then eating it. Turns out this is called a "soggy biscuit." You learn something new everyday.
In the heat of annoyance about "WP:NOTCENSORED" cries, I decided to add the image of the guy eating his cum drenched biscuit on the [[Soggy biscuit]] article. Well it was quickly taken down! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Soggy_biscuit#Removing_the_article_image But at least we have plenty of other images of people in sexually deviant situations with their faces shown. :P -Sarah "You can't always get what you want," Stierch On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Andreas Kolbe <jayen...@yahoo.com> wrote: > --- On Fri, 30/9/11, Ryan Kaldari <rkald...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > > From: Ryan Kaldari <rkald...@wikimedia.org> > Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Blog from Sue about censorship, editorial > judgement, and image filters > To: foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Date: Friday, 30 September, 2011, 0:28 > > > On 9/28/11 11:30 PM, David Gerard wrote: > > This post appears mostly to be the tone argument: > > > > http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Tone_argument > > > > - rather than address those opposed to the WMF (the body perceived to > > be abusing its power), Sue frames their arguments as badly-formed and > > that they should therefore be ignored. > > Well, when every thoughtful comment you have on a topic is met with > nothing more than chants of "WP:NOTCENSORED!", the tone argument seems > quite valid. > > Ryan Kaldari > Quite. > I have had editors tell me that if there were a freely licensed video of a > rape (perhaps a historical one, say), then we would be duty-bound to include > it in the article on [[rape]], because Wikipedia is not censored. > That if we have a freely licensed video showing a person defecating, it > should be included in the article on [[defecation]], because Wikipedia is > not censored. > That if any of the Iraqi beheading videos are CC-licensed, NOTCENSORED > requires us to embed them in the biographies of those who were recently > beheaded. > That if we have five images of naked women in a bondage article, and none > of men having the same bondage technique applied to them, still all the > images of naked women have to be kept, because Wikipedia is not censored. > And so on. > Andreas > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > -- GLAMWIKI Partnership Ambassador for Wikimedia <http://www.glamwiki.org> Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American Art<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SarahStierch> and Sarah Stierch Consulting *Historical, cultural & artistic research & advising.* ------------------------------------------------------ http://www.sarahstierch.com/ _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
