Are you aware of any "providers" that use other sites' category systems in that way? E.g. to disable Google searches with "safe search off" for all of their subscribers, disable access to adult Flickr material, etc.?
A. --- On Fri, 23/9/11, Tobias Oelgarte <tobias.oelga...@googlemail.com> wrote: From: Tobias Oelgarte <tobias.oelga...@googlemail.com> Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Possible solution for image filter To: foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Date: Friday, 23 September, 2011, 0:26 Am 23.09.2011 01:21, schrieb Andreas Kolbe: > And where would the problem be? If a user prefers to go to a Bowdlerised site > like that, > rather than wikipedia.org, where they will see the pictures unless they > specifically ask not > to see them, then that is their choice, and no skin off our noses. > A. > The problem would be simple. The people that depend on one "provider" for internet access would have no other choice then to use a censored version. They type "en.wikipepedia.org", the local proxy redirects them to "filterpedia.org" which provides only the content which is not in one of the pre-choosen categories. It's simple as that. They don't choose to use that site but they will be forced to. *We* would make that possible. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
