Am 19.09.2011 18:08, schrieb Stephen Bain: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Tobias Oelgarte > <tobias.oelga...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> We discussed this already and came to the conclusion, that you would >> need hundreds of these categories to filter out most of the >> "objectionable content". > And once again, the labelling doesn't need to be perfect (nothing on a > wiki is) if an option to hide all images by default is implemented > (which at present there seems to be broad support for, from most > quarters). If we implement an "hide all images" option, then we solved already 95% of all possible use cases mentioned before. Now we take on the doubtful work to categorize for even lower potential need? I support the "hide all" option. But if we have this feature, then, especially then, i see absolutely no need for any categorization. Then we create hobby project for censors with even less support from the community. I definitely can't follow your reasoning in this case.
_______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
