> > *My boss (...) can't open the pregnancy article at work because the intro > is NSFW our workplace. > *
I'm sorry but i don't find the problem in this article. *I can't open the [[vagina]] article at work either, because of the really > in your face photo of a vagina when you open it up > * The article is about vagina. The only picture there who might be "NSFW" is this one: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Azvag.jpg who only shows what are the anatomy of a vagina. I find very educational. And BTW, if you don't want to see a vagina, don't open the article. *who is totally grossed out by that photo on the vagina article, > gahhhhhhhhhhh, surely she can't be the only one! > * No it was not. There are in fact a category in commons ( http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Vagina ) and in that category i found the image who replaced the Image you dislike so much<http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Human_vulva_with_visible_vaginal_opening.jpg>. But not because you don't like, because the one in the article now is more clear. _____ *Béria Lima* <http://wikimedia.pt/>(351) 925 171 484 *Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. É isso o que estamos a fazer <http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Nossos_projetos>.* On 6 September 2011 15:15, Sarah Stierch <sarah.stie...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Does your feminism excludes necessity for sexual education? > > > > > No, but, I can send you some pictures on Commons that have been "speedy > keeps" of strippers with their legs spread wide because they are > "educational and high quality." > > My boss, who is bound to have a baby any day now, can't open the pregnancy > article at work because the intro is NSFW our workplace. I can't open the > [[vagina]] article at work either, because of the really in your face photo > of a vagina when you open it up, however, I can totally read the intro to > [[penis]] since there isn't a big giant penis in one's face upon opening > it. > I work in an educational environment (a museum institution, which has > exhibits on sexuality, gender, etc) and I can't even look at these articles > at work, take that as you will. > > Sarah > who is totally grossed out by that photo on the vagina article, > gahhhhhhhhhhh, surely she can't be the only one! > > -- > GLAMWIKI Partnership Ambassador for the Wikimedia > Foundation<http://www.glamwiki.org> > Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American > Art<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SarahStierch> > and > Sarah Stierch Consulting > *Historical, cultural & artistic research & advising.* > ------------------------------------------------------ > http://www.sarahstierch.com/ > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
