On 09/06/2011 08:29 PM, ???? wrote: > On 04/09/2011 20:11, church.of.emacs.ml wrote: >> On 09/04/2011 07:43 PM, Kim Bruning wrote: >>> Assuming that the .de community is similar to the wikimedia community at >>> large […] >> >> That is where I disagree. The personal image filter doesn't make much >> sense in German Wikipedia, since the German culture is generally pretty >> liberal with respect to depictions of sexuality, (partially) violence >> and of course Muhammed. So it's clear that there is simply no or a very >> small necessity for a filter; thus the rejection. > > > I call bullshit. If wikipedia or its chapters should ever be found to be > liable under German law there is going to have some explaining to do: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pornography_by_region#Germany > http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2007-09-12-n23.html > http://www.chillingeffects.org/international/notice.cgi?NoticeID=5990 > http://www.chillingeffects.org/international/notice.cgi?NoticeID=2187
I was talking about German culture, not German law. In other words, people don't seem to be so weirded out by sexuality like some* Americans are. Look up Freikörperkultur for an example. * (I don't want to overgeneralize things :)) --Tobias
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
