If I may bite back, the original outline of this filter, in a form not dissimilar to the one that lay at the heart of the referendum, was placed in the Wikimedia public space more than a year ago, on the Meta page devoted to the Study on Controversial Content -- and put in that space clearly as a proposal, not as a fait accompli. Since then, a discussion on its merits and demerits has taken place in a number of forums-- with literally -- what-- a thousand, more than a thousand public comments added?
Does that not count as a fundamental discussion? Robert Harris > Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 21:01:38 +0200 > From: k...@bruning.xs4all.nl > To: foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Personal Image Filter results announced > > On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 07:09:13PM +0200, Lodewijk wrote: > > > > I do however not understand why we are having the fundamental discussion all > > over again. > > Ok, I'll bite. When did we have it the first time? :-) > > sincerely, > Kim Bruning > > > -- > [Non-pgp mail clients may show pgp-signature as attachment] > gpg (www.gnupg.org) Fingerprint for key FEF9DD72 > 5ED6 E215 73EE AD84 E03A 01C5 94AC 7B0E FEF9 DD72 > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
