On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 09:29:25PM +0100, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> On 4 September 2011 20:28, Kim Bruning <k...@bruning.xs4all.nl> wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 09:16:42PM +0100, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> >> > The trouble is that at its edges, education is fundamentally
> >> > disconcerting, upsetting and subversive. And that this is a matter
> >> > only of degree, not of kind.
> >>
> >> I agree, and I would never turn on such a filter. That doesn't mean
> >> that other people shouldn't be allowed to if they want to.
> >
> > Right, but then they won't be educated.
> >
> > But, if they don't want to be educated, erm, why are they using
> > an encyclopedia in the first place?
>
> They won't be educated *as much*. They can still be educated. If they
> don't use Wikipedia at all because of fear of seeing things they don't
> want to see (or, because their parents fear they will see things their
> parents thing they shouldn't see), then they aren't getting educated
> by Wikipedia at all. Seeing almost all of Wikipedia is better than
> seeing none of it.
Seeing *almost* all of wikipedia introduces potential bias, which
can actually be rather much worse than seeing none of wikipedia
at all.
I think we have a rule about that.
aka:
Thomas Dalton Wrote:
> ... they ... can still ... fear... their parents...
Hmm, I'd need just a few more words to *really* misquote you. ;-)
sincerely,
Kim Bruning
--
[Non-pgp mail clients may show pgp-signature as attachment]
gpg (www.gnupg.org) Fingerprint for key FEF9DD72
5ED6 E215 73EE AD84 E03A 01C5 94AC 7B0E FEF9 DD72
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
