Please, let me forward this conversation also to our brand new libraries list.
Aubrey 2011/8/19 Fred Bauder <fredb...@fairpoint.net>: >> SAGE Open is one of those "PLoS ONE clones". Others include >> BMJ Open: http://blogs.bmj.com/bmjopen/ >> Scientific Reports: http://www.nature.com/srep >> AIP Advances: http://aipadvances.aip.org/ >> G3: http://www.g3journal.org/ >> New Journal of Physics: http://iopscience.iop.org/1367-2630 >> Open Biology: http://royalsocietypublishing.org/site/openbiology/ >> >> A related commentary: >> http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2011/03/29/might-copies-of-plos-one-change-journals-forever/ >> . >> >> Daniel > > "PLoS ONE clones" seems to imply a problem. Are these journals bad in > some way? > > Fred > >> >> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Fred Bauder <fredb...@fairpoint.net> >> wrote: >>> A breakthrough from an unexpected source: >>> >>> http://sgo.sagepub.com/ >>> >>> Fred >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> foundation-l mailing list >>> foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org >>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l >>> >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
