On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Risker <risker...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure what kind of on-wiki discussions you might expect to see, > Sage. > I think he might have been going with Chris' assertation that every page was affected, which doesn't appear to be true - the template's transcluded on just under 1,000 pages. My guess is that all of the pages Chris saw were affected, but the vast majority of articles weren't, meaning that it's not anything new. I recognize that this is probably a touchy issue given the controversy on the English Wikipedia over flagged revisions (which I thankfully wasn't a part of), but maybe flipping flagged revisions on for everything in the template namespace would help the cause. Certainly most edits to templates are fine, but when it comes to truly malicious vandalism (as opposed to newbie test edits, and young kids screwing around) templates are both the most affected, and the most visible. As-is, a number of highly visible templates are fully protected, so this would be a step down in many cases and a step up for many others. -- [[User:Ral315]] _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
