On 4 June 2011 01:10, Thomas Morton <morton.tho...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Given the situation can we not be clear on the details of this? > > I have various views on the matter, but all of them really depend on what > exactly this person did. > > As with all such matters I see no reason why discussion of the details > cannot be conducted visibly, and if provided with the adequate level of > detail I would be happy to venture an opinion. > > But precluding that, you are asking the views of a group of people who > probably do not have a full (or event partial) view of the facts of this > case... for which you are asking for a global response.... > > And you are then wondering why they question this issue! > > I think there is no question is cases such as this; lay the details plainly, > and screw any pussy footing around the details. If this individual has a > history that means BAD THINGS will happen, I feel details will sway more > than allusions. > > Tom
We know Poetlister's meatspace identity. Are you demanding that we repeat that? -- geni _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
